Blancanieves review: silent style

MaryAnn’s quick take: A valentine to early filmmaking, this silent-movie pastiche is gorgeous, lush, and bursting with passion. It presents a familiar fairy tale with a wondrous air of freshness and newfound intimacy.
I’m “biast” (pro): nothing
I’m “biast” (con): nothing
(what is this about? see my critic’s minifesto)
Get new reviews via email or app by becoming a paid Substack subscriber or paid Patreon patron.

As an exercise in style and as a valentine to early filmmaking, this silent-movie pastiche is unquestionably gorgeous, lush with creamy black-and-white photography and bursting with passion, both from the characters onscreen and from writer-director Pablo Berger, who presents a familiar tale with a wondrous air of freshness and newfound intimacy.

A 1920s Spanish twist on Snow White, it posits a rich and famous bullfighter paralyzed in the ring (Daniel Giménez Cacho), the daughter his wife died giving birth to, and the nurse (Maribel Verdú: Pan’s Labyrinth) who wormed her wily way into his grief-stricken heart when he was at his most vulnerable emotionally as well as physically. Now, sweet young Carmencita (adorable Sofía Oria) suffers horrible abuse at the hands of her wicked stepmother; later, teen Carmen (Macarena García) will follow in her father’s matador footsteps with the help of a band of intrepid showman dwarfs.

The well-beaten path of the tale is beautifully suited to the silent format, which utilizes only a few intercards, and even they are barely needed: the deviations from the traditional fairy tale are laden with potent symbolism of their own, and we are instantly struck with their power and poignancy. The almost overwhelmingly marvelous score, by Alfonso de Vilallonga, soars with the kind of feeling that wraps you up in the escapist fervor of cinema.

If you’ve forgotten why you feel in love with movies, this will remind you, and rekindle your romance.

share and enjoy
               
If you’re tempted to post a comment that resembles anything on the film review comment bingo card, please reconsider.
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
If you’re logged in here to comment via Facebook and you’re having problems, please see this post.
PLEASE NOTE: The many many Disqus comments that were missing have mostly been restored! I continue to work with Disqus to resolve the lingering issues and will update you asap.
subscribe
notify of
4 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
LaSargenta
LaSargenta
Thu, Jul 11, 2013 7:58pm

It played at the Angelica. We saw it and, yes, it is beautiful.

RogerBW
RogerBW
Fri, Jul 12, 2013 4:56pm

Ooh. Sounds fascinating.

Patrick
Patrick
Thu, Jul 18, 2013 7:39am

I saw it at the indie theater I volunteer at. I agree with your review 100%. Also, Pepe the Rooster could give the dog in The Artist a run for its money!

Greyhound
Greyhound
Mon, Aug 05, 2013 10:59pm

Well, I’m sold. Must figure out where this is playing . . .