The Boy and the Beast movie rating: yellow light

Get new reviews in your email in-box or in an app by becoming a paid Substack subscriber or Patreon patron.

The Boy and the Beast yellow light

MaryAnn’s quick take…

Orphaned human child travels to another world to become warrior apprentice to a grumpy monster, and it’s a same-old hero’s journey with nary a twist to surprise you. A few instances of gorgeous and magical imagery cannot make up for the lack of genuine emotion or a fresh story. Strictly for devoted anime fans.
I’m “biast” (pro): nothing
I’m “biast” (con): not much of an anime fan
(what is this about? see my critic’s minifesto)

(My Ratings posts are a quick way for me to share my reaction to a film. This post will be updated if/when I ever write a review. Feel free to discuss the movie in depth in the comments section.)

share and enjoy
             
If you’re tempted to post a comment that resembles anything on the film review comment bingo card, please reconsider.
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll measure. If you’re not a spammer or a troll, your comment will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately.
subscribe
notify of
25 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
Jonathan Roth
Jonathan Roth
Thu, Mar 03, 2016 11:42pm

Sorry to hear that. I’ll certainly be watching this because I really like Mamoru Hosoda’s other films, and any fim with animal-people is right up my alley.

(Speaking of, I’m eagerly awaiting the Zootopia/Zootropolis review. :D )

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Jonathan Roth
Fri, Mar 04, 2016 9:44pm

I can’t post for weeks yet on Zootropolis, so don’t hold your breath.

Jonathan Roth
Jonathan Roth
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Fri, Mar 04, 2016 9:49pm

Well, I’ll just have to take heart in the green light then.

Danielm80
Danielm80
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Sun, Mar 06, 2016 3:20am

The sad thing is: Zootopia is a thinly-disguised allegory about race relations, and yet the cast is about 90% white people. Gorgeous animation, though.

Josh Leitzel
Josh Leitzel
reply to  Danielm80
Mon, May 23, 2016 9:54pm

*rolls eyes*

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Josh Leitzel
Tue, May 24, 2016 11:13pm

Why are you rolling your eyes?

Josh Leitzel
Josh Leitzel
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Tue, May 24, 2016 11:16pm

Because of Danielm80’s entire comment, essentially.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Josh Leitzel
Wed, May 25, 2016 6:11pm

If you would like to engage in conversation here, then please, you know, engage in conversation.

dsjkfhjkj lkjjkhljkjkh
dsjkfhjkj lkjjkhljkjkh
Thu, Mar 10, 2016 4:42am

<<>>

Kung Fu Panda 3 Full Movie >>> http://imgur.com/QHDW0Lv

Kung Fu Panda 3 Full Movie >>> http://bit.ly/1oLvcDu

Kung Fu Panda 3 Full Movie >>> http://bit.ly/1oLvcDu

The Perfect Match Full Movie >>> http://bit.ly/220iLFZ

The Perfect Match Full Movie >>> http://bit.ly/220iLFZ

The Brothers Grimsby Full Movie >>> http://bit.ly/1R7oWMY

The Brothers Grimsby Full Movie >>> http://bit.ly/1R7oWMY

The Young Messiah Full Movie >>> http://bit.ly/1P0crSj

The Young Messiah Full Movie >>> http://bit.ly/1P0crSj

Risen Full Movie >>> http://bit.ly/223xUTG

Risen Full Movie >>> http://bit.ly/223xUTG

The Revenant Full Movie >>> http://bit.ly/1LRH5lZ

The Revenant Full Movie >>> http://bit.ly/1LRH5lZ

Selma Goran
Selma Goran
Thu, Apr 28, 2016 3:35am

If you’re interested in an anime film with a more coherent story, female characters, and depth and meaning; go see ‘Only Yesterday’. It was recently re-released with an English cast, namely Daisy Ridley from Star Wars.

Josh Leitzel
Josh Leitzel
Mon, May 23, 2016 9:58pm

I will never truly understand the “not much of an anime fan” mantra. It’s just a medium of which stories are told. It’s not a genre or anything. It encompasses all genres and honestly, digging deep enough is bound to reveal plenty to like for people of various preferences and tastes. You don’t hear people claiming that they’re not “Western television fans.” Sure, there’s a lot of garbage too, but you know, the 90% law. Although Japanese animation does have specific production traits that differ from the norm elsewhere in the world, so I guess I can understand if those tendencies turn some people off.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Josh Leitzel
Tue, May 24, 2016 11:13pm

It’s just a medium of which stories are told

And it’s a medium that I don’t much appreciate.

Josh Leitzel
Josh Leitzel
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Tue, May 24, 2016 11:26pm

I can understand not personally being into it, but it does deserve a certain, basic level of appreciation. Especially with auteurs such as Mamoru Hosoda, Shinichiro Watanabe and Satoshi Kon existing within it.

I don’t consider myself much of a fan, I just appreciate talented and passionately produced entertainment. Even if my respect can outweigh my own enjoyment of it.

Hell, The Restaurant of Many Orders is a Japanese animated short film, yet most people would never know from first glance or judgement because of their own preconceived ideas of what anime “is,” or is supposed to look like. It doesn’t make any sense, honestly.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Josh Leitzel
Wed, May 25, 2016 6:12pm

but it does deserve a certain, basic level of appreciation.

Why?

Bluejay
Bluejay
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Wed, May 25, 2016 3:05am

But, MaryAnn, you DO recognize good anime when you see it. You’ve reviewed several Studio Ghibli films very favorably, and you’ve enthusiastically praised Satoshi Kon. Maybe it’s not necessarily that you don’t appreciate the medium, but just that you don’t think a lot of stories told in that medium reach Miyazaki/Kon standards?

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Bluejay
Wed, May 25, 2016 6:16pm

Maybe it’s not necessarily that you don’t appreciate the medium

No, it’s that the tropes of the medium — like the style of animation — are not something that generally appeal to me. That doesn’t mean that some movies can’t overcome my aversion. But few do.

Josh Leitzel
Josh Leitzel
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Thu, May 26, 2016 1:38am

Isn’t it obvious? The works of those gifted few deserve at the very least an ounce of respect for their talent, influence and artistic vision alone. Not to mention how much other, notably western, media has been influenced by the likes of Kon, Oshii and Miyazaki.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Josh Leitzel
Sat, May 28, 2016 9:03pm

Saying I am not inclined to a particular genre or style does not deny anyone any respect. I am sharing with you my mindset as I go into a film. That’s it.

Josh Leitzel
Josh Leitzel
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Sun, May 29, 2016 12:20am

Well a lack of appreciation is essentially denying respect.

Animation doesn’t have an official “style.”

Bluejay
Bluejay
reply to  Josh Leitzel
Sun, May 29, 2016 3:37am

claiming a lack of appreciation is essentially denying a level of respect.

Really? I’m not a football fan. If a football game came on TV I’d change the channel. But I’m aware that football requires skill, strategy, grit, hard work, and thousands of hours of practice. Football players are capable of physical feats I could never do, and they have my respect. But it’s not my thing and I’m not inclined to watch it. It is absolutely possible to not be into something and still respect it.

MaryAnn is admitting her bias upfront, which few reviewers are honest about. That gives you information about where she’s coming from and helps you decide whether you find her review useful. If it’s not useful to you, move on.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Josh Leitzel
Sun, May 29, 2016 7:55am

Animation doesn’t have an official “style.”

Anime does.

I am done explaining myself to you.

Josh Leitzel
Josh Leitzel
reply to  MaryAnn Johanson
Sun, May 29, 2016 8:21am

No, it doesn’t. It may have a predominant style/aesthetic, but as already said, there’s hardly an official bible in place that requires it all to look stereotypically “anime.” There is a lot of visually unique stuff out there beyond the typical late night industry that crowds the market. Like the previously mentioned Restaurant of Many Orders. The method of “limited animation” that grew to wide use through the 70’s is the only aspect that could mostly be considered universal. And even then, there are exceptions.

“I am done explaining myself to you.”

That’s fine, you never had to.

Bluejay
Bluejay
reply to  Josh Leitzel
Sun, May 29, 2016 11:20am

No one ever claimed there was an actual anime bible. But as you yourself just admitted, anime has “a predominant style/aesthetic,” a “typical [style] that crowds the market,” and a “method… that grew to wide use through the 70’s… that could mostly be considered universal.” So anime DOES have a TYPICAL look that people can find appealing or unappealing, depending on their taste. Yes, you point out exceptions, but no one ever said there weren’t any exceptions. And MaryAnn HAS reviewed several works of anime very favorably, mostly by the masters you mention. So, really, what are you arguing about?

Danielm80
Danielm80
reply to  Bluejay
Thu, Jun 16, 2016 6:42pm

Here’s an interesting, fairly technical article on the differences between Japanese and American animation and how they came about. It has very little to do with the discussion above, but it’s fascinating, if you happen to be fascinated by animation or by cultural history.

https://wavemotioncannon.com/2016/01/08/why-over-sixty-years-of-animation-history-still-remains-obscure/

Bluejay
Bluejay
reply to  Josh Leitzel
Sun, May 29, 2016 3:25am

She has praised Kon and Miyazaki’s works. She’s given them more than an ounce of respect.