Quantcast
subscriber help

artisanal film reviews | by maryann johanson

Star Trek Beyond movie review: future positive (but it won’t come easily)

Star Trek Beyond green light

MaryAnn’s quick take…
Intense action; smart, funny nods to its roots while moving in a new direction; and explicit confrontation of a problem always at the heart of Star Trek.tweet
I’m “biast” (pro): totally devout Trekkie
I’m “biast” (con): nothing
(what is this about? see my critic’s minifesto)

The United Federation of Planets starship Enterprise visits a place of my science fiction dreams in Star Trek Beyond, and it is a place I didn’t even know I longed to spend time in until I saw it here: Starbase Yorktown. Forget the toy-tops-in-space that were the starbases of the 1960s TV show. This Yorktown is a gemlike sphere floating in infinity, with no up or down except as dictated by the local gravity of the many curved planes that crisscross its internal bubble: it’s those wheeled-city-in-space illustrations of the 1970s expanded into a whole artificial world, a vision of sparkling urbanity of architecture and culture, of millions of people of many species living and working in harmony in a place of their joint creation. It brought out a big ol’ geek grin from me, and then tears of geek joy.

Star Trek Beyond is a very welcome return to the optimism that has always fueled the series.
tweet

After the grimness of Star Trek Into Darkness, the previous installment of the rebooted Trek series, Yorktown and everything it represents is a very welcome return to the optimism that has always fueled Star Trek. And yet it’s also the thematic focal point of a plot that is about reconciling the problem (one that I’ve mentioned before) that has always been at the heart of Trek: Can we really imagine, even at our most hopeful, that humanity could transform itself in the course of the mere few hundred years between now and Trek’s 23rd century from a species prone to and geared for violence and bigotry on levels both personal and societal to one that goes out of its way to universally reject such ugliness? I have no doubt that über geek Simon Pegg (Ice Age: Collision Course, Star Wars: The Force Awakens), who doesn’t just portray Scotty again here but who also cowrote the script with Doug Jung, has contemplated this conundrum for as long as I and other fans have. I’ve often worried that such a transformation would require a fundamental change in human nature, which seems vanishingly unlikely. This new Trek series, with its first two installments, seemed to have been finding a middle ground between us warmongering apes of the 21st century and the near-utopian idealism and peacefulness of the 24th-century-set The Next Generation, and here it is ultimately all about acknowledging that even getting to its more plausible but still very optimistic version of the 23rd century is going to leave behind lots of people and lots of philosophies that many today would consider not only useful but noble.

Gonna click my heels and jump for joy: Karl Urban nails down his Doctor McCoy.

Gonna click my heels and jump for joy: Karl Urban nails down his Doctor McCoy.tweet

None of that heady stuff gets in the way of Beyond’s very intense, often literally breathtaking action-packed story. Kalara (Lydia Wilson: About Time, Never Let Me Go), escape-podded survivor of a lost survey ship from a previously unencountered alien species, shows up at Yorktown — the starbase is at the very edge of Federation space — and the Enterprise takes on a rescue mission to find the rest of her crew, presumed to have crash-landed on a planet inside an uncharted nebula. The mission goes south very fast, and Kirk (Chris Pine: The Finest Hours, Horrible Bosses 2) and Co. find themselves dealing with baddie Krall (Idris Elba: Bastille Day, The Jungle Book), of yet another previously unencountered species. He’s sort of lizardy, with technology that is sort of insectile, all of which plugs into our human hindbrains to say “scary”… but the fact that he is an entirely new kind of villain for Star Trek — he’s not a reboot of any bad guy we’ve seen before across the franchise — means we have no idea what to expect from him. Which is also terrifically scary and suspenseful.

Star Trek Beyond is packed with very intense, often literally breathtaking action.
tweet

What’s the beyond of the title refer to? There’s the uncharted nebula, of course, and also how multiFast & Furious director Justin Lin navigates action when he is actively engaging the reality of no-up-or-down. It’s sometimes confusing and doesn’t always work — ironically, more when Lin tries to apply his space-based visual dynamic in a gravity field — but forgivable: the filmic language of this is still being developed. Mostly, though, beyond has meta meanings. This Enterprise is, Kirk informs us, three years into its five-year mission, which means it’s starting to move into a realm that the original Enterprise crew never got to (their show was canceled three years in; their movies picked up many years later). There’s tons of Trek-style humor here, stuff that could have been plucked from the 1960s show as well as riffs on its beloved tropes — it’s smart, funny acknowledgement of Trek’s roots while moving Trek in a new direction. The rebooted characters here are starting to truly take alternate-universe paths that will distinguish them from the ones we’ve known before. This is dealt with in a particularly poignant way as Spock (Zachary Quinto: Hitman: Agent 47, What’s Your Number?) uses the news of the death of Ambassador Spock (tracking the death of actor Leonard Nimoy), who crossed universes into this one, to make big decisions about what to do with his life. There is also accidental meta poignancy in how the sudden death last month of Anton Yelchin (Green Room, Experimenter), this alt-universe’s Chekov, must now take a very different road; producer J.J. Abrams has said that the role will not be recast. (Chekov gets a bigger role here than he has in the previous two films, and shows off some major Starfleet skills; I’d love to imagine that Chekov will get a big promotion and go off to have his own adventures apart from the Enterprise crew.) There is freshness in how Karl Urban (The Loft, Walking with Dinosaurs) is given room to get his Bones McCoy out from under the shadow of original Trek, and in how Zoe Saldana’s (The Book of Life, Guardians of the Galaxy) Uhura is set up to be a damsel in distress and then totally sidesteps that; it’s a clear smackdown of a cliché that needs to die. And yes, John Cho’s (Grandma, The Tale of the Princess Kaguya) Sulu is gay, which we learn only sidewise in a sequence that highlights how difficult long-term deep-space missions are when you’ve got family waiting at home for you. (Cowriter Jung cameos as Sulu’s partner.)

Another absolutely badass new female character girls and women will be scrambling to cosplay: survivor, polymath, and classic-rock lover Jaylah.

Another absolutely badass new female character girls and women will be scrambling to cosplay: survivor, polymath, and classic-rock lover Jaylah.tweet

Ah, and there’s also the second fantastic wholly original female character of the 2016 summer blockbuster season (after Ghostbusters’ Jillian Holtzmann): Sofia Boutella’s (Kingsman: The Secret Service, Monsters: Dark Continent) Jaylah, of yet another new alien race who reveals herself to be tough, prickly, competent, and full of angst. Hooray.

Nodding to the past, navigating the present, and looking to the future? Nothing could be more Star Trek.


green light 4 stars

Like what you’re reading? Sign up for the daily digest email and get links to all the day’s new reviews and other posts.

shop to support Flick Filosopher

Independent film criticism needs your support to survive. I receive a small commission when you purchase almost anything at iTunes (globally) and at Amazon (US, Canada, UK):

    
Star Trek Beyond (2016) | directed by Justin Lin
US/Can release: Jul 22 2016
UK/Ire release: Jul 22 2016

MPAA: rated PG-13 for sequences of sci-fi action and violence
BBFC: rated 12A (moderate violence, threat)

viewed in 2D IMAX
viewed at a semipublic screening with an audience of critics and ordinary moviegoers

official site | IMDb | trailer
more reviews: Movie Review Query Engine | Rotten Tomatoes

If you’re tempted to post a comment that resembles anything on the film review comment bingo card, you might want to reconsider.

  • Patrick

    MaryAnn,

    Near the end of your review, you referred to Uhura as “Uhuru”. I just thought you should know.

  • Danielm80

    s always been at the heart of Trek: Can we really imagine, even at our most hopeful, that humanity could transform itself in the course of the mere few hundred years between now and Trek’s 23rd century from a species prone to and geared for violence and bigotry on levels both personal and societal to one that goes out of its way to universally reject such ugliness?

    I’m going to skip watching the RNC and see this movie instead.

    Somewhere in the world, Milo Yiannoppoulos is outraged by the film because it doesn’t represent anyone with his point of view.

  • RogerBW

    The trailers really went out of their way to misrepresent this. I assume the marketing people thought that people who like thinky stuff are already Trek fans who will see this anyway, and so they have to drag in the sci-fi action fans with the trailers.

  • Doh! Thanks for pointing out my typo. I’ve fixed it.

  • Well, this *is* an action movie. The thinky stuff is all around the edges… and I cannot imagine how it could have been represented in a trailer.

  • Nathan

    Happy to hear that this is a good film, the trailer had me worried.

  • Kathy_A

    I’ve been hearing lots of good stuff about this film–yay! I’m going to see it today (I’m off work, once I finish with this damn morning load that I don’t have someone trained up as backup after our layoffs last month got rid of my former backup, but my computer won’t let me log into my VPN, so I have to wait until the IT guys get in and call me back…just, grr), in a double-feature with Ghostbusters, and I can’t wait.

  • Danielm80

    …but the fact that he is an entirely new kind of villain for Star Trek — he’s not a reboot of any bad guy we’ve seen before across the franchise — means we have no idea what to expect from him.

    Based on the uniforms in the top photo, I’m assuming Kirk teams up with Sergeant Pepper and Mr. Kite to defeat the Blue Meanies.

    And if he doesn’t, I really want to see that movie.

  • Not a spoiler: Those uniforms seem to be some sort of gear specifically designed for use in escape pods. Like, I dunno, maybe they offer extra protection when you don’t know what sort of environment you’re going to end up trying to survive in. That doesn’t become a factor in this film, so it’s hard to say.

    I think they look pretty cool, though.

  • Patrick

    If “Dr. Who” was given the same “action, yes! thinking, no!” treatment as “Star Trek” has been given by JJ Abrams and Co.,…well, there be hordes of pissed off Whovians.

  • bronxbee

    i’m sure there are plenty of pissed off trekkers too. and some of us are pretty pissed off at moffat’s take on Doctor Who. there’s always someone or something to be pissed off or pissed about.

  • It would depend on how it was done.

  • Pinkk

    I don’t know. I love Star Trek and I always thought what the movies needed, was more action, more big movie feeling to it and not the feeling of being a 2 hour TV episode.

    The movies have been great and I’m happy they’ve finally went the route of the characters enjoying more modern music. Not saying everyone should hate classical, but I always wondered how in the future everyone just listened to classical (then jazz) and ignored rock, rap, pop, even country.

  • Matt Clayton

    I liked how light on its feet “Beyond” is, compared to the previous two films. I like how Pegg & Jung scrap the least effective parts of Abrams’ universe, i.e. Alice Eve and Benedict Cumberbatch and the 9/11 truthism from Orci & Kurtzman’s writing. There is more optimism and I like the themes of unity and teamwork throughout. But I felt underwhelmed overall, thanks to the underwritten villain. Idris Elba deserved better. And most of the action… Lin cut them to pieces — especially the hand-to-hand combat.

    But Jaylah is the MVP in “Beyond.” Great character, great set-up, and I like her quirks (“I like the beats and chanting”). Sofia Boutella is a star in the making.

  • Matt Clayton

    I’m a casual DW fan, but I think JJ Abrams would do a stand-up movie adaptation of “Who.” He was pretty reverential to the SW universe when he did The Force Awakens.

  • RogerBW

    Being excessively reverential with Who isn’t necessarily a good thing. It gets you seasons like 22-24 (and arguably chunks of New Who). You need a hard-nosed production team that has some respect for the mythos, but not too much.

  • Matt Clayton

    I think any DW film adaptation will likely be skewed towards the younger fans who came in with Eccleston/Tennant or Smith/Capaldi. If anything, it would have a few nods towards the older series, but styled like a Russell T. Davies TV episode.

  • Beowulf

    Gosh, my wife and I found this surprisingly disappointing. The budget is apparent in all the battle and space city scenes, but the planet they spend time on looks like one of the less convincing studio sets from the original ST. The director is supposed to be good with action, but the fight scenes are way too close-in to show anything. The dialogue is muffled, not helped by false teeth and glued-on face parts. Isn’t it amazing that almost every creature in the galaxy is bi-pedal, humanoid, and four limbed. The wonderful actors need a better script. Wow, I’m disagreeing with BOTH RT and MA.

Pin It on Pinterest