The Jungle Book movie review: welcome to the jungle

Get new reviews in your email in-box or in an app by becoming a paid Substack subscriber or Patreon patron.

The Jungle Book green light

MaryAnn’s quick take…

Goes right up to the bleeding edge of cinema to tell a story that is strapping yet simple, and hugely appealing. Disney found a good reason to redo an old film.
I’m “biast” (pro): nothing
I’m “biast” (con): nothing
I have read the source material, but not since I was a kid (and I like it)
(what is this about? see my critic’s minifesto)

Hollywood is in the grips of a terrible fever that might most kindly be called “a fear of the new” and least generously “creative bankruptcy.” The disease has been manifesting itself in the spate of remakes and reboots of older films… sometimes films that aren’t even that old. (Spider-Man, for instance, is about to get his third big-screen reboot in only 15 years.) Disney is suffering from a particularly virulent form of the syndrome: it is planning live-action remakes of all its classic animated films; we’ve already seen one in last year’s Cinderella, which was a wild commercial success but was almost entirely superfluous in a storytelling sense, or even merely as a moviegoing experience.

But sometimes there is a good reason to remake an old film, and Disney found it with its new version of The Jungle Book. A little darker than the 1967 cartoon, and not quite a musical — though it does include the two best songs from the previous film, “The Bare Necessities” and “I Wanna Be Like You” — this is a filmmaking achievement that goes right up to the bleeding edge of what 21st-century cinema technology can do to tell a story that is strapping yet simple, certainly compared to the overstuffed blockbusters we are typically bombarded with, and hugely appealing. This is a sheer delight for kids and adults alike, a rare family film that is actually suitable for the whole family.

Here’s the thing, though: this new Jungle Book is still mostly an animated film. Young Mowgli, the orphaned “man cub” raised by wolves in the Indian jungle, is played by a human being, young newcomer Neel Sethi, who is not only completely adorable but exudes intelligence and packs a wallop of fierce determination. But he is the only live-action element. The jungle and all the animals are computer generated — the film was shot entirely in a warehouse in Los Angeles — but you’d be hard-pressed to guess that. The lushness of Mowgli’s world is palpable, and the 3D has beautiful depth that makes you feel as if you could walk right in. And the animals look utterly, touchably, and in some cases — cute wolves cubs! — pettably real. (The marvelous voice cast includes Bill Murray [Rock the Kasbah, Aloha], Ben Kingsley [The Walk, Self/less], Idris Elba [Zootropolis, Avengers: Age of Ultron], Lupita Nyong’o [Star Wars: The Force Awakens, Non-Stop], Scarlett Johansson [Hail, Caesar!, Lucy], Giancarlo Esposito [Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials, Derailed], Christopher Walken [Eddie the Eagle, Jersey Boys], and Garry Shandling [Captain America: The Winter Soldier, Over the Hedge].)

Screenwriter Justin Marks retains the core of Rudyard Kipling’s fiction — as well as that of the 1967 film — in the tale of Mowgli and his pals Bagheera the panther (voiced by Kingsley) and Baloo the bear (Murray), and Mowgli’s targeting by the man-eating tiger Shere Khan (Elba). But emphasized here is a fable about not denying who you are — Mowgli will never be a wolf no matter how hard he tries — while also being loyal to your friends no matter who they are; Mowgli’s lack of wolfness does not restrict him from considering them his family anyway. And as Mowgli finds new ways to deploy his “tricks” — as the other animals call his clever, and inevitably man-like, use of tools, such as turning a big shell into a bowl for drinking water — another fable creeps in: one about humanity’s responsibility to be thoughtful stewards of the natural world (which comes with the reminder that we are a part of it), because we have the potential to do such damage to it if we are careless.

But this is an action fantasy first! And director Jon Favreau (Chef, Cowboys & Aliens) stages some extraordinarily thrilling sequences; the landslide that sends a herd of water buffalo into a frenzy of stampeding fear is heartstopping, not least because Mowgli is right in the middle of it. In a way that few others movies have achieved — Avatar might be the only one — we are right in the middle of it, too, in every way we can be. This new Mowgli and his animal friends are true charmers. You won’t be able to get “Bare Necessities” out of your head for days afterward, and you won’t even mind.

share and enjoy
If you’re tempted to post a comment that resembles anything on the film review comment bingo card, please reconsider.
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
notify of
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
Aaron Jones
Aaron Jones
Thu, Apr 14, 2016 11:38pm

I wasn’t looking forward to this movie, but I’ve stumbled into a weekend screening. I hope I am as enthralled by it as you were.

Mon, Apr 18, 2016 2:15am

How’s ScarJo as Kaa? Hers was the only voice I wasn’t buying in the preview clips and trailers. It sounds more cat-like than snake-like to me.

Jim Mann
Jim Mann
reply to  Nina
Mon, Apr 18, 2016 1:50pm

She’s quite good. Her voice has a hypnotic quality that’s perfect for Kaa.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Nina
Wed, Apr 20, 2016 9:54am

She fine, but it’s a small part: just one scene.