
I’m “biast” (con): nothing
(what is this about? see my critic’s minifesto)
In the 1990s, a 13-year-old boy was kidnapped by the mafia in Sicily in order to force his mobster father to stop cooperating with the police. He was held for a very long time, and the situation did not come to a pleasant end. The Italian writing-directing team of Fabio Grassadonia and Antonio Piazza, for their second feature, took this terrible reality and transformed it into the nightmare that is Sicilian Ghost Story. (They were also partly inspired by a short fantasy story by Marco Mancassola.) This cruel film hopes to use its fantastical surreality to, I think, find some sort of redemption in the senseless and violent abuse of a child. That’s certainly a noble endeavor, but also surely an impossible one.
And so it is here: impossible. There is no magic here, no meaning. There is only the desperate, failed attempt to find some.
Sicilian Ghost Story gives the poor boy, Giuseppe (Gaetano Fernandez), a lovelorn girlfriend in 12-year-old Luna (Julia Jedlikowska), and posits a literally mystical connection between the two children that prompts her to agitate in their small town on Giuseppe’s behalf. You see, no one — not the school he is absent from, not the townspeople, not even his family — will even acknowledge that the boy has disappeared, never mind the horrific why of it. Luna’s stern mother (Sabine Timoteo) had forbidden her daughter to have any contact at all with Giuseppe, because of who his father is; Mom is utterly unsympathetic to Luna’s trauma.

So the girl screams at people a lot, and wanders — sometimes literally (maybe?), sometimes in dreams — their wooded island, looking for him. This goes on for so long that is becomes strained to the point of tediousness and psychological implausibility: Luna’s grief feels preposterous, which is itself a preposterous thing for a story that is all about an overabundance of sensitivity to do.
The preternatural aspect of Luna’s search is meant, it’s clear, to lend a tinge of the romantic — sweet, chaste, and age-appropriate, but still — to the young couple’s separation. Instead it builds to something that feels like the most problematic aspect of Romeo & Juliet being celebrated as a worthy thing, and worse, as the thing that somehow redeems Giuseppe’s experience. It’s appalling. There’s deliberate, provocative gruesomeness to be found here, but this is what turned my stomach.


















I’ve heard of this story, so I know what happens to the boy in the end. That being said, could you spoil the ending, with regard to what happens to Luna? I’d like to know what made this film so problematic.
Spoiler coming…
…
…
(Adding lines of text so the spoiler isn’t revealed on the “latest comments” page…)
…
…
She attempts to kill herself by eating rat poison, and the ghost or spirit of the boy alerts her best friend, who comes to her rescue.
It seems the reviewer understood nothing of this film. What a shame.
Would you like to explain what she missed, or do you just enjoy making vague insults and running away?
‘Vague insults and running away’? how about your vague insults? Anyway, no here I am. I strongly disagree with ‘deliberate, provocative gruesomeness’. There is nothing deliberate or gruesome. The reviewer seems to know that the film is based on a tragic episode of Italian recent history but maybe she should have read more about it. That was a horrible story that shocked people in Italy. And I’m sorry the film is not trying to be intentionally provocative, life is indeed gruesome at times. That’s just what it is. Maybe she would prefer comedy or drama with a happy end? Well this is not that type of story. And the director introduced the love story element and the fairy-tale dimension in order to tell a story that was otherwise only tragic and as some sort of redeeming factor. I’ve watched the movie, I love the directors, I’ve not read a single negative review of this film, I love how Julia and Gaetano portrayed the characters and I’m Italian so perhaps I simply understand the story and its emotional undetext much better.
But that’s exactly what MaryAnn says: “This cruel film hopes to use its fantastical surreality to, I think, find some sort of redemption in the senseless and violent abuse of a child.” The difference is that you thought it worked, and she didn’t.
Well, you’ve read this one. :-) . Here’s another.
https://www.slantmagazine.com/film/review/sicilian-ghost-story
It’s true this film is almost universally acclaimed. But opinions about art are always subjective, and there’s no rule that says all critics have to think or feel the same way.
Yup, clearly, that is the obvious takeaway from my review!
Maybe such a horrible story that shocked so many people shouldn’t be redeemed or uplifted. And yet, you accuse me of wanting happy endings, when that’s the aspect of the movie that you approve of!
You have now. We critics are not a hive mind, and we are not required to agree with one another.
If you have to be Italian to appreciate this movie, then probably it’s a good thing that all my non-Italian readers were able to read my reaction.