
I’m “biast” (con): nothing
(what is this about? see my critic’s minifesto)
Well, here we have it. With Shazam!, a comic-book movie has finally made it explicit that the superhero story, at its most reductive, is nothing more than an adolescent-male power fantasy. Fourteen-year-old Billy Batson (Asher Angel) is chosen by a wizard (Djimon Hounsou: Captain Marvel, Serenity) to be his champion, complete with a grownup body (Zachary Levi: Thor: Ragnarok, Tangled) clad in spandex and with all sorts of caped-crusader abilities, such as “bullet immunity” and superstrength; all Billy needs to do is shout “Shazam!” in order to shift back and forth between his usual teen scrawniness and the magical adult-sized badassery. And what does he do with this unexpected boon? He mostly shows up school bullies, buys beer, goes to a strip club, and goofs around with exploring the extent of his superpowers, even to the point where that sometimes puts innocent people in danger.
Small favors: the movie doesn’t actually take us inside the strip club.

Now, I’m sure that anyone who is now or who has ever been a teenaged boy will delight in how — finally and at last! — the gloves have come off and the curtain of pretense has been lifted and they can finally revel in being seen by Hollywood. But adolescent-male power fantasies is pretty much all Shazam! has going for it. There’s not much else happening here. There’s no larger resonance; Shazam! isn’t actually about anything. This is taking place in a world in which superheroes are real — Batman and Superman exist, this is made crystal clear — and yet it doesn’t feel like it. (That would be an amazing thing to explore: what is the world like for ordinary people when alien demigods and vigilante crime fighters are shaping culture? Instead we get tacky references to Harry Potter and Star Wars.) And I’m sure some will insist that it’s good that the comic-book movie is “fun again” — as if comic-book stories haven’t been overtly about punching Nazis and other social-justice matters from their very beginnings. For someone who needs at least a little bit of meat in their fantasies, Shazam! is a disappointment.
And Shazam! isn’t even simply pure exhilarating fun. Because nothing really matters here, that seems to have been an excuse for screenwriters Henry Gayden (the extremely derivative Earth to Echo) and Darren Lemke (the unclever meta of Goosebumps) to be lazy and director David F. Sandberg (the shockingly misjudged Annabelle: Creation) to indulge in cheesiness. (Um, there are some really cheap-looking FX here.) Right from the get-go, the entire premise of Billy’s elevation to superhero is confused at best and suspect at worst. The wizard who needs a champion has been trying for decades, at least, to find one, but no one has been worthy enough. Yet the movie doesn’t bother to let us know — and this matters, hugely — whether, once the wizard finally accepts Billy as his champion, the wizard is merely so desperate to Shazam-ize anyone that he overlooks Billy’s unworthiness or whether there’s supposed to be something about Billy that elevates him above the many other humans the wizard has tested. From what we do see of Billy’s character, both before and after his chosenness, he’s certainly not a bad person, but there doesn’t seem to be anything spectacularly, uniquely good about him, either. We cannot even deduce from everything that follows which is the case with Billy. Which is a problem. If you squint hard enough, you might discern a motif of “With great power comes great responsibility” — although of course no one can articulate that because Shazam is a DC character and Spider-Man, who is famously taught that lesson, is from the other place — but that is even more watered down because we have no idea upon what basis Billy was granted his superpowers, and with what mindset he is using them.

Oh, and there’s this, too: In a montage sequence, we see a succession of other people talking about their meeting with the wizard and subsequent rejection as champion, and those people come in a wide range of genders and colors. For all those who complain about how superhero movies have allegedly gotten too concerned with “diversity” lately, this is what a sop to that notion actually looks like, both within the context of the story as well as in the larger cultural milieu in which this movie exists. Like, “Hey, we tried to find a woman or a person of color for the part, but only the white guy measured up. Sorrynotsorry!”
It’s a slow-moving slog for the movie to get Billy from playing superhero to an encounter with the ill-conceived putative villain, Dr. Thaddeus Sivana (Mark Strong: Kingsman: The Golden Circle, Miss Sloane), who is, in fact, one of the wizard’s long-ago spurned would-be champions. It’s a rejection that Sivana never got over, and now he wants to steal the Shazam powers from Billy. Except… Sivana has his own powers, absorbed from the manifestations of the seven deadly sins that the wizard had been containing. (This movie is such a mishmash of nonsense.) It’s not at all clear what powers Sivana lacks — he seems to have all the same ones that Billy has — or what he will do if he succeeds. The movie tries to make a joke out of its own low stakes, with Sivana monologuing about his evil plans in a way that suggests we don’t even need to hear them to know what he wants. But this comes way too late in the movie, and seems more a justification for not developing Sivana as any kind of authentic, plausible character than anything else. We’re meant to just take him as a generic villain… and I guess it’s fair that he’s as generic as the rest of the clichés here.


















Yeah, I suspected/feared the movie might turn out this way. Even when made obvious, the teenage male power fantasy angle doesn’t seem like a fresh take, given that we’ve already had a ton of movies where teenagers have superpowers without having to morph into older adult bodies (all the X-Men and Spider-Man movies, including the excellent Spider-Verse). Is Zachary Levi any fun to watch, at least? He’s a great actor when given the right role (see Marvelous Mrs Maisel season 2).
So what does Billy call himself when in superhero mode? Is it just “Shazam”? (Which could lead to problems if he says it out loud.) Obviously it can’t be “Captain Marvel” anymore.
So… he’s… gluttonous, slothful, and horny all the time? Huh. :-)
He did nothing for me. He was actually at the screening I attended, talked a bit beforehand. He is much more charming as himself than he is in this movie.
Well, bummer.
I’ve been waiting years for someone to cast Wallace Shawn as Dr. Sivana. I’m still waiting. I think I’ll skip the movie and save the popcorn for this thread.
Enjoy your popcorn, but it’s gonna be a dull thread. The trolls have become SO BORING.
Not for the first time, and apropos of this movie, I wonder how old some of these dudes are. If we could all see each other, would we discover that we’ve been arguing with a bunch of 13-year-olds this whole time?
So you give this 2.5 but CPT Marvel is 5 out of 5, as in that is an absolutely perfect movie with no flaws. Lol sure.
Why don’t you tell us what you liked about this movie?
Not sure where you get that definition, but you do you.
Hi, wasn’t expecting a response tbh. I’ll let you know what I think about Shazam when I go see it. But my original comment was because our opinions diverge somewhat on Cpt Marvel which leads me to believe we will not be on the same page with this movie either. Also what what I meant about a perfect movie is that I didn’t notice you bring up any negative points you had with that movie (but perhaps I just missed them) and when you give something a perfect score you are essentially saying it has no major flaws because if it did you’d have needed to dock points. But hey if that’s what you think, fair enough. I’m just saying I think we have different tastes.
Hi, so you thought you’d just drop some abuse and run away? Does that make you feel good?
Yeah, I figured you hadn’t seen it.
Most generous of you.
No movie is legitimately flawless or perfect, even if we critics sometimes use that kind of hyperbole… and yet I didn’t even say anything close to that about *Captain Marvel.* Maybe if you guys stopped being so defensive about these movies and just shut up and *listened* to what women (and people of color) are *telling you* about why these movies are so important, you might begin to get a tiny bit of an inkling of understanding about why they are important to us, and why they matter.
Abuse? Wow? Please point out what it was it was I said that insulted or belittled you? Were my comments sexist? Racist? Did I make any insinuations about your sexual orientation? Your religion perhaps? As for “you guys” which guys? Everyone with a penis? Or just me and “my kind” because you obviously know every single thing about me from a few comments made on the internet. As for importance we are talking about comicbook movies here. Light popcorn fun. A distraction from the cold reality of normalcy. Why can’t we just judge a movie as a movie. Do you remember when you could just like a movie as a movie and not because of whatever political campaigns it was dragging behind it or because a bunch of people you don’t agree with told you to hate it.
I’m not your kindergarten teacher, or your mother. Figure it out for yourself.
There’s no such thing as “just a movie.” If you think there is, this is the wrong site for you.
Always with the projection with — you guessed it — you guys.
Well my mother is dead, so asking her would be difficult. I’m pretty sure I didn’t abuse you and the fact you seem to just want to deflect the point only confirms that. No such thing as just a movie? Now I just feel sorry for you. It must be a terrible thing to have to view all aspects of light entertainment not in terms of quality or content but whether it ticks some political or diversity box or other agenda or crusade. Movies should be something you can bond with people over not because you both agree on every political or social issue or because you’re part of the same club but just because you both liked the movie and could celebrate and enjoy that fact. Don’t you ever watch a movie just to chill out and relax? Just to have fun and forget about the real world for a couple of hours?
I’m sorry about your mother, but she didn’t tell you to ask her. She told you to figure it out yourself.
You left a condescending, dismissive comment PREEMPTIVELY DISAGREEING WITH HER even though you haven’t seen the movie yet. And you felt free to take that tone because you didn’t expect her to call you on it. So, yeah, you didn’t say anything blatantly racist or misogynist, but it was obnoxious and meant to be hurtful all the same.
Ask yourself this: If you were discussing this review with her in person, meeting her for the first time, would those exact words and that exact tone be the first thing you said to her? And you really expect her to not take any offense and not think you’re a jerk? If you still think you’re “pretty sure it’s not abusive,” you may need to rethink how you relate to others.
I could respond to other parts of your comment, but that’s more time than I want to spend.
Yes this I would use exactly the same language I used if I was talking to someone face to face. The “tone” aspect howwhow is something that you are infering from my comments. However if my comments have offended I do apologize most sincerely
If you had walked up to me, a total stranger to you, and spoken the words to you wrote here, I wouldn’t have been anywhere near as polite as I was in my reply here.
Okay… I have apologized for my initial remarks if you took offence at them. I honestly did not mean them to be taken that way and did not think that was how other people would view them. However I do not think threatening me is particularly helpful here. Again to me this is just talk about movies I don’t really think it’s worth getting violent over.
Please quote the exact words she said that threatened violence against you.
“I wouldn’t have been anywhere near as polite as I was in my reply here” to me that implies a threat of violence
You have got to be kidding.
No, I’m really not. It’s like if someone said to me you wouldn’t find me so polite if there weren’t all these witnesses around
So the only way she could be less polite than saying “Not sure where you get that definition, but you do you,” is to beat you to a pulp. Got it.
Not sure where you get that definition, but you do you,” ? I did not say this or use it as an example in my previous comment so I do not understand why you are quoting this.
*Sigh* Dude. Here is your initial obnoxious comment. Here is MaryAnn’s reply, which is what I quoted. She said that if you had said your initial comment to her in person, she would have been less polite in person than in her reply — because your initial comment was obnoxious, and so she would have had a stronger reply for you in person. And for some reason you took that as a threat of violence? LOL.
As I said earlier: you really need to rethink how you relate to people.
I’m done here.
Again, I do not know why you are bringing this up? I did not take exception with this. If I said “I will punch your face in” would it make it okay with you if I said before that “you’re a really nice guy”? I done with you too
You are speaking from a position of privilege that allows you to not see anything political in a movie, or any cultural baggage. Consider yourself lucky. Or, again, as I suggested: Listen to the people telling you why a movie is problematic, or how it counters existing problems, and assume they are sharing their own honest experience, and not just trying to ruin your good time.
Captain Marvel doesn’t empower women at all. Women aren’t blank slates. They aren’t underdeveloped characters that give nobody any reason to care about them. Women are real people with real issues and flaws. Film characters are supposed to reflect that.
I saw Captain Marvel with three women and one male, and the only one who came out of the film enjoying it was the male (and that was only because he likes Brie Larson outside of Captain Marvel).
Such woke. Many feminism.
so biased opinions on a nice movie.
i think you should review the movie when you are not high…..
i think you made your mind before hand that u have to give a negative review…
captain marvel 5 of 5 seriously. grace randolph said correctly that there will be a few assholes who would not like the movie bcz it is a DC movie…..
What about you, have you seen the movie yet? (It doesn’t release in most places until tomorrow.) Looks like you’ve already made up your mind that it’s a “nice movie.” Or maybe Grace Randolph made up your mind for you.
Nice try, but she loved Man of Steel and Wonder Woman and didn’t care for Guardians of the Galaxy. Try considering the possibility that she doesn’t judge movies based on which studio made them.
You have been banned and your outrageously abusive other comments have been deleted. I’m leaving this one here because of Bluejay’s response, which is pretty much what I would have said. And to discourage any other commenters from posting the same old tired bullshit. This sort of nonsense is not welcome here and will not be tolerated.
Watch it, it’s really great movie with lovable characters and heartfelt stories, a funny jokes, and character conversation which make me smile all the time. A drawback is the fighting and CGI scene which is not as grand as other superhero movies.
It’s true, not enough movies have character conversation.
Yes, especially a sweet and heartwarming conversation which make audience smile all the time. not a perfect, but still great.
Something made the entire audience you saw a movie with smile? Did you poll everyone as they left the cinema to confirm this?
Not ENTIRE audience ( sorry for misunderstanding ). It may sound like an assumption that not based from real statistic method like survey, analytic, poll, etc. I use the word audiences because I heard a various good word of mouths from twitter, facebook page, and positive comment about this movies at this topics.
Also, I heard a lot of laugh come from audiences that watch the movie at same theater with me.
A lot of laughter came from the audience I saw it with, too. So what? It doesn’t change my opinion of it. My opinion is not subject to herd mentality.
Actually, I didn’t post this comment to say that your opinion is wrong or try to change your mind ( people have a different opinion and perspective and I understand that), I posted this comment to share my good feeling from watching this movie to other reader who read this review.
And now you’ve heard a less-than-positive professional assessment from me.
So tired of unprofessional “critics” who decide their review before they even see it. Don’t you ever look at all the other near unanimous positive reviews and think, “huh, maybe I got this one wrong?”. She gave Captain Marvel a 5/5. That’s insane. All fans and critics are agreeing this is a far superior film. She also game Aquaman a 1.5/5. At least try to hid your bias. Rotten Tomatoes has really gone downhill. They’ll let anyone be a critic these days. This review was nuts. The film is great. Just what the genre needed.
That’s not how criticism works.
That’s not how criticism works.
No, they’re not, and even if this were true, why on earth would that change my opinion? Are you so weak-willed that you just follow the crowd?
I was one of the very first RT critics way back when the site first started.
I specifically go out of my way to highlight my biases. Do you understand your biases?
Mostly, though, I have to ask you this: Why the hell do you care what I think? Why does it bother you so much that my opinion does not align with yours? How does it impact you at all?
Says the guy who has decided he likes a movie he probably hasn’t seen yet, since it doesn’t officially release to the public until tomorrow at the earliest. Here’s a hint, genius: Critics go to advance screenings.
So when most critics like a film that you like, they must be correct. I bet when you liked a film that most critics hated (let me guess: Batman v. Superman, with a 27% RT rating) you probably ranted about how critics are dumb and irrelevant. Here’s another hint, genius: people who don’t share your opinion exist, and that’s okay.
Hello burner account, Actually I saw it weeks ago at a screening. You know they have those right? Hence why I said it’s great.
Thank you for your high praise. I wasn’t doubting that she saw the movie. Is reading comprehension usually this hard for you?
Nope. That movie was a mess. At least the version released in theatres. The Director’s Cut is decent, though. Cheers.
So you’re just claiming she “decided her review before she saw it,” based on no evidence whatsoever. Got it.
And you’re clearly her burner account.
Bahahaha! Believe whatever you want, dude.
I don’t do shit like that. Quit it, or get banned.
The movie hasn’t even opened yet. My review has barely been up for four hours. And I’m wondering if I’m gonna need to shut down comments here entirely already…
I wouldn’t mind, to be honest. I highly doubt we’ll get any dissenting comments that are more interesting or less abusive or less mind-numbingly predictable than what we’ve gotten already.
I’ll see how bad it gets. I’m like Charlie Brown facing Lucy with the football, though, every time: Maybe *this time* it’ll be different…
Well, it’s a few hours later and not getting any better — predictably, it’s turning into an off-topic Captain Marvel/Brie Larson hatefest. You can save us the aggravation… :-)
Sounds about right. A critic who can’t stand to be critiqued. The irony.
If you can’t tell the difference between disagreeing and being a prick, you’re the latter.
I thought it worked better as a family comedy than a straight superhero film. But yeah, it missed some prime opportunities to skewer superhero films while being one itself.
And a good point about Dr. Sivana’s end game had he actually defeated Billy/Shazam… it’s not made clear other than bad things happening.
Why did he even need to bother defeating Billy? Why didn’t he just go off and do whatever he wanted to do?
I guess the Seven Fates wouldn’t be able to bring down the world by themselves since the Champion was still around. That made no sense to me either.
One thing that I liked about the movie was the foster home setting, which sets it apart from other superhero movies. You didn’t address that in the review much.
Because the foster home setting is almost entirely superfluous. The reason Billy is in foster homes also doesn’t make the tiniest bit of sense, because…
there is no way in hell that Billy’s mother, the one who abandoned him, would not have been found by the authorities. Maybe her abandonment would have been enough for him to be removed from her, but that’s a whole different story.
They made it clear. He spent his whole life wanting this power that the Wizard offered him and took away. He was jealous of Billy. All he wanted was his power.
But — as I noted in my review — the movie makes it seem like he already has all the same powers as Billy… and then some.
Except he clearly doesn’t as the Seven Deadly Sins explicitly say that the “chosen one” is a threat to them and that he must be “killed before he realizes his true potential.” If the sins were more powerful than the wizard, then there would be no point to even bother dealing with Billy. Not to mention the wizard wouldn’t have been able to hold them captive for so long.
If you want to complain about villains (which are already notoriously bad in modern comic book films), complain about Yon-Rogg. I mean, who the hell even is Yon-Rogg? The movie surely doesn’t give me a hand in figuring that out.
I actually enjoyed the movie and this is what a Shazam origin movie should be. I also am in favor in the direction it took when they discussed a little of what foster kids have to deal with. A world, that is rarely explored with tact especially in a movie that is essentially all about laughs. The protagonists are children or in the case of Mark Strong, someone who is fixated on that age range so it makes sense that you get little takes of what crazy things you would think of at that age.
Been a Captain Marvel/Shazam fan since I was a kid. I will be taking my boys to go see it.
I didn’t go see Marvel’s Captain Marvel but my son did… he said the movie was okay Gave it a 6 out of 10.
I couldn’t imagine if Zachary Levi made similar comments about white females that Brie Larson said about males. They would rake him through the coals…lol
If Zachary Levi had said “We need to hear from more male critics because reviewers are overwhelmingly white women,” it wouldn’t be true. So he wouldn’t say it.
They would have crucified him if he made comments like that and everyone knows it.
I can’t wait to see the movie. I kinda hate that DC has turned my favorite hero into an immature bumbling idiot. I remember him transforming into a mature adult back when I read the comics…. watching the Captain Marvel serial and the 70s TV series.
Hopefully they’ll allow the character to develop as he continues to learn how to use his powers.
Yes, because saying something like that would have been untrue. Counter-factual. A lie.
Lmao low stakes? You gave Captain Marvel a 5/5. That film had exactly zero stakes.
And you complain that Billy didn’t use his powers like a hero would but instead used it for personal gain and adolescent tom foolery as if that wasn’t his whole arc in the film.
…Uh, extermination of a refugee population, and destruction of a large portion of the earth by Accuser bombs? Okay then.
Except there are no stakes if you are given no reason to care about any of the characters. You never feel that any of the characters are in danger throughout the entire movie. And the Accuser bombs had to be the most laughable part considering it was introduced in a off hand comment and we were never even given a moment to think “oh no what if she fails?”
“No reason to care about any of the characters” is your subjective opinion. I cared quite a lot.
And if you have things to say about CM, take it to the CM thread.
It an opinion based off the fact that we know nothing about any of the characters. We are outsiders observing the interactions of strangers rather than being apart of the story. If you cared about the characters it definitely couldn’t have come from the movie itself.
Again, a subjective opinion. I found plenty of evidence to care.
And again, this has nothing to do with Shazam.
Like what then? The movie sounds good on paper, but none of it is executed properly. For example, the Skrull subplot would have been way more effective if the plot twist was revealed later in the film. If that was the case Carol realizing she was on the wrong side would have been a ton more tragic. Instead we got her throwing a fit 40 minutes in about the villain who we know nothing about by the end of the film.
It does have to do with Shazam in light of the ridiculousness of this review in comparison to her Captain Marvel review. As if Captain Marvel isn’t one of the worst MCU films and as if Captain Marvel is somehow a better film than Wonder Woman.
Only favorable comments about CM are allowed here.
Anything else… take it to the CM tread. …lol
In the meantime…. SHAZAM!!!
Your opinions are not fact.
I found plenty of reason to care about Carol Danvers.
Yeah, I complained about his arc. Adolescent tom foolery are low stakes.
People have been making DC/Marvel movie comparisons every since the comic hero movie craze started.
I believe Ben Affleck has probably taken more heat as a character than any other actor. Never seen any critic from any thread block anyone or consider shutting down a thread because of the dragging he took. .. And he’s still getting dragged…lol
Only DC fanboys have been doing that. Why not stop doing that and take each movie on its own merits? Easy!
Complain about other critics at their sites.
1) I get the feeling they couldn’t bring in Black Adam (who IS supposed to be a rejected Shazam hero gone bad) and so rewrote Dr. Sivana from being a cliched mad scientist into being… whatever he is now.
2) I had gotten the vibe from the trailers that they were going for over-the-top slapstick instead of a rumination on superpowers and what calls us to be heroes, which I guess is an attempt to avoid the standard origin story every other superhero movie has been, but means it will lack that human quality when it will matter most.
3) I get the unsettling feeling that this is going to be more Superman III than Superman II. Oy.
4) Which is a shame, because Captain Marvel (no, the DC one) *is* a pure fantasy that children have (and it *did* cater early and often to boys, sorry) of being a superhero all along, all we need was a magic word to SHAZAM us into caped good guys beating up bullies and saving people and battling larger-than-life villains. From your review, it looks like they took that idea and… well, squandered it.
DC ripped from Fawcett comics … Lex Luthor is their version of Sivanna.
The human element is most definiely there. This review just ignores all of the quiet moments completely and focuses almost entirely on what Bill chooses to do with his powers(a small section in comparison to the rest of the film).
Dr Sivana was already rewritten to this in the comics.
The quite moments are trite and obvious.
Maybe. But the slapstick isn’t funny, original, or interesting. And hardly over-the-top.
“This is what a sop to that notion actually looks like, both within the context of the story as well as in the larger cultural milieu in which this movie exists.”
You clearly went into this movie wanting to hate this film. You are just going to blatantly ignore that his foster family is also from a variety of backgrounds? And what did you want them to do in that montage? Have only a bunch of white people? That wouldn’t be realistic at all.
Do you do that to movies? I sure don’t. I want to love them all.
Thanks for pointing out another sop to diversity.
I’m gonna watch this movie with my boys..
Then I will give our review here to settle this once and for all.
SHAZAM!!
What’s wrong with you having one opinion and her having a different one? Why does a stranger on the internet have to be WRONG in order for you to enjoy a movie?
What’s your obsession with opinions? And why do you respond to every comment instantly?
Why do you keep replying to me?
Because you were replying to me? Lmao. I’ve also noticed you’ve been responding to every comment on here vigorously defending Ms Johanson and I just wanted to know what was up.
I’m jealous… nobody has defended me.
I’ll defend you.
You’re gone.
Dude, your last reply was to a comment I was making to someone else. So maybe you’re the one who’s obsessed with me for some reason?
I’m replying because I happen to have some time to kill and I’m on this page. Is that a problem for you?
I’m a longtime reader here, and I speak up against the bullshit I see when I feel like it. I have no problem with civil disagreements (I’m not challenging this guy, for instance) and I’ve disagreed with MAJ myself on some occasions (see my comments in her review of Godzilla). There’s a difference between civilly disagreeing and laying out your own opinion, vs obnoxiously attacking the reviewer, questioning the reviewer’s motives, dismissing her judgment, etc. As I said to someone else here: If you can’t tell the difference between civil disagreement and being a prick, you’re the latter.
You’re banned.
Because it’s her burner account. It’s her only, single, solitary supporter that lives on this page and responds to everyone within seconds, even when they haven’t said anything negative. It’s clearly her herself. LOL.
FYI to all the other losers: This shit gets you banned. Do not project your idiotic gameplaying onto me.
You’re on the verge of being banned. The comments are not here for you to have a pissing contest.
Never said anything was wrong with her opinion… sheeesh… a lil sensitive aren’t we?
Quit it or get banned. You’re almost there already.
What on earth do you mean, “settle this once and for all”? This isn’t a duel at high noon.
Well I completely disagree with this review…It seems like you took a very aggressive angle at a pretty lighthearted movie.
If you don’t like teenage boys being teenage boys then that’s your problem not the movie’s problem.
I don’t think you like the vision that this movie is being told through. It’s from the kids point of view not yours. If you choose or can’t see the world from their point of view then you’re not gonna enjoy it.
I thought it was funny and had good action throughout. 4 out of 5.
If it was about a young girl or girls maybe you would have liked it more and I respect that by the way…but as a man who was
like these boys…it’s pretty spot on and fun.
I am closing comments. Maybe I’ll reopen them after the movie opens. Maybe not.
I really do despair that it’s impossible to have civil conversations about movies.