Greyhound movie review: Tom Hanks goes a-LARPing

MaryAnn’s quick take: How very kind of Tom Hanks to lend his gravitas and inescapable likability to a bunch of WWII naval reenactors on their weekend-getaway “crossing the north Atlantic in 1942 dodging U-boats” campaign.
I’m “biast” (pro): love Tom Hanks
I’m “biast” (con): nothing
I have not read the source material
(what is this about? see my critic’s minifesto)
Get new reviews via email or app by becoming a paid Substack subscriber or paid Patreon patron.

Wow, live-action role-playing has gotten intense. And so authentic looking! How very kind of Tom Hanks to lend his gravitas and inescapable likability to a bunch of World War II naval reenactors on their weekend-getaway “crossing the north Atlantic in 1942 dodging U-boats” campaign.

Gamemasters Aaron Schneider — responsible for behind-the-scenes organization and the extraordinary additional step of filming the campaign — and Hanks himself — who wrote the campaign (inspired by C.S. Forester’s novel The Good Shepherd) — are extremely dedicated to realism. They went so far as to build a significant percentage of an apparently historically accurate WWII-era US Navy destroyer, where all the action occurs. I’m no expert on LARPing, but as I understand it, LARPers usually have to rely mostly on realistic costumes and personal props to immerse themselves in their fictional milieu — medieval LARPers, for instance, don’t get to play in a real castle! As you might expect, the costumes and props here are on a par with the beautifully replicated setting, so the experience was surely incredibly immersive. It must have been hugely enjoyable and a lot of fun for the participants.

Greyhound Tom Hanks
“Did they sink our battleship? Maybe we should sink one of their battleships…”

This campaign takes its title, Greyhound, from the codename of the destroyer, which Hanks’s (A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood, Toy Story 4) character commands, leading a multinational convoy protecting a multinational merchant fleet ferrying war supplies to Liverpool. Hanks’s officer is inexperienced, but every time U-boats attack, he throws saving rolls. Hooray! (Or, wait: Is that Dungeons & Dragons? How do LARPers determine who wins a confrontation?) It’s all very exciting, I think. The LARPers are often playing at night, and it’s often difficult to see what’s going on, even given the gamemasters’ adherence to realism. Probably the murkiness is part of the realism — I suppose the Nazis wouldn’t have attacked in the daytime, when it would have been easier for the Allies (and us) to see what was going on. But I question slightly the point of letting us peek into the LARPing action if we can’t really tell what’s happening.

Greyhound
Battleships sinking, or something…

Anyway, the gamers do seem deeply engaged in making the reenactment as bona fide as possible, to the point of not mucking up the gameplay with pointless detours into their characters’ motivations, or wasting time talking about anything other than tactics and battle stuff, or worrying about things like “relevance” or “metaphor” that might bog down the campaign. This is basically Hanks — and a couple of other familiar faces: actors Stephen Graham (Rocketman, Hellboy) and Rob Morgan (The Photograph, Just Mercy) showing themselves to be secret LARPers — playing an elaborate game of Battleship, which is thankfully much better than that movie actually inspired by the classic board game.

Elisabeth Shue (Battle of the Sexes, Chasing Mavericks) shows up for about two seconds at the very beginning — in full-blown 1940s regalia, and good on her for that — to wish Hanks well as he goes off on his little battle weekend with the boys. It’s sweet when friends can endorse each other’s hobbies, even when they can get this elaborate and time-consuming.

share and enjoy
               
If you’re tempted to post a comment that resembles anything on the film review comment bingo card, please reconsider.
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
If you’re logged in here to comment via Facebook and you’re having problems, please see this post.
PLEASE NOTE: The many many Disqus comments that were missing have mostly been restored! I continue to work with Disqus to resolve the lingering issues and will update you asap.
subscribe
notify of
12 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
LaSargenta
LaSargenta
Fri, Jul 17, 2020 6:39pm

Dull, eh?

Tonio Kruger
Tonio Kruger
Sat, Jul 18, 2020 1:10am

Elisabeth Shue (Battle of the Sexes, Chasing Mavericks) shows up for about two seconds at the very beginning — in full-blown 1940s regalia…

Well, I can already guess which two seconds of this movie I’ll most enjoy watching…

Nick Gold
Nick Gold
Sat, Jul 18, 2020 4:06am

I think this may be the most idiotic movie review I’ve ever read. Really.

amanohyo
amanohyo
reply to  Nick Gold
Sat, Jul 18, 2020 3:49pm

I know I know, I wish film reviews were written like Wirecutter articles, so they could mold seamlessly to my consumer oriented lifestyle. I’ll try to translate the review into that superior, easily digestible format:

—–

The Best Mediocre Tom Hanks Movies

If you’ve got a mild hankering for middling Hanks, look no further. After putting in hundreds of hours watching, thinking, and writing our reviewer has got you covered.

Who Should Watch This

If you don’t enjoy character development, conversations that aren’t about military tactics, well lit scenes, or flawed protagonists facing interesting challenges, consider consuming the online entertainment product entitled Greyhound.

Our Favorite Mediocre Hanks Films

Dragnet, Turner and Hooch, Joe Versus. the Volcano, That Thing You Do!, You’ve Got Mail, The Terminal, The Polar Express, The DaVinci Code, Angels and Demons, Inferno, Larry Crowne, The Circle, Greyhound

The Competition

Saving Private Ryan, Captain Phillips, Master and Commander, Das Boot, Dunkirk, Cloud Atlas, Castaway, Sully

How She Picked and Tested

Our reviewer mentally compared the film to others she has watched and asked herself, “Did I enjoy this? Were the characters and conversations interesting and well acted? Was the plot engaging? Did the cinematography, set design, sound and lighting enhance or diminish the immersion?” Then she expressed her findings via a metaphor that communicated her overall impression of the film.

Why You Should Trust Her

She’s worked as an independent film reviewer for over two decades, written hundreds of reviews, and clearly states her biases up front. If you share her general taste in movies, her opinions and perspective will be of great value.

—–

There, so much better. None of that pesky creativity or personality to worry about. If I had time, I’d include graphs comparing the sound design, special effects, hair and make-up, historical accuracy, and action/conversation ratio on a ten point scale to get objective rankings.

Then I’d just compare the average of those scores to my previously calculated MHT (minimum Hanks threshold) and definitively determine whether the film was worth purchasing for 91 standard human lifetime minutes, factoring in the age reduction and Coronavirus multiplier.

It’s such an obviously superior reviewing format and could easily be adapted for literary and music reviews too. I’ve always suspected that Hamlet was 2% worse than Macbeth, but if someone would just write a Wirecutter review, I could finally know for sure.

althea
althea
reply to  amanohyo
Sat, Jul 18, 2020 8:27pm

Neato.

Crewcrusher
Crewcrusher
reply to  amanohyo
Sun, Jul 19, 2020 5:41am

Is attacking another forum really a defense of a hamfisted review?

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Crewcrusher
Tue, Jul 21, 2020 3:49pm

There is no attack of another forum here.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Nick Gold
Tue, Jul 21, 2020 3:47pm

Do you get pleasure out of being a drive-by jerk?

Crewcrusher
Crewcrusher
Sun, Jul 19, 2020 5:39am

The review might have been amusing: except all movies, plays and tv shows would fall under the category of LARPing.
So, this review is really not as clever as the snickering author thinks it is.

Tonio Kruger
Tonio Kruger
reply to  Crewcrusher
Sun, Jul 19, 2020 7:31pm

I must be missing something because I would have thought that the obvious difference between LARPing and movies, plays and TV shows is that the people who perform in the latter actually expect to get paid while the people who perform in the former are usually considered at best talented amateurs. Like Emma Peel. (Okay, not like Emma Peel, but that point is that they’re not normally expected to collect a paycheck.)

But there I go, siding with the snickering author again — which is really strange considering how often she and I disagree on stuff.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Tonio Kruger
Tue, Jul 21, 2020 3:51pm

The difference isn’t about amateur vs pro. It’s about crafting a story meant to be enjoyed and digested by a viewer, one that hopefully works on multiple layers, vs having some fun that works only for the participants.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Crewcrusher
Tue, Jul 21, 2020 3:49pm

except all movies, plays and tv shows would fall under the category of LARPing.

Nope. But thanks for playing!