Cyrano movie review: out of tune

MaryAnn’s quick take: Peter Dinklage is wonderful, but this feels like a suggestion of a movie, not an actual one. It’s not romantic; there’s no humor, no absurdity. Its unpleasantness is as puzzling as it is inescapable.
I’m “biast” (pro): love Peter Dinklage
I’m “biast” (con): nothing
(what is this about? see my critic’s minifesto)
Get new reviews via email or app by becoming a paid Substack subscriber or paid Patreon patron.

There’s a scene early in Cyrano, a musical adaptation of the classic 1897 stage play by Edmond Rostand, in which the titular wordsmith is advising a baker and wannabe poet on how to choose his literary metaphors. The baker is struggling with making something-something about stars and constellations work, and Cyrano gently suggests that an analogy closer to home might be more apt. You know, the fleshiness of dough, the sensuality of kneading, the warmth and visceral pleasure of fresh bread.

“Aha!” the baker enthuses. The music swells and the camera swoops in to big bowls of plump dough being worked over by sexily floured hands, fingers teasing and squeezing… and it’s all faintly squicky, and slightly laughable, yearning for earnestness but ineptly falling into parody. It’s not emblematic of everything that’s wrong with Cyrano, but it hits many of those discordant notes.

Cyrano Haley Bennett Ben Mendelsohn
Some men are simply always a bad idea…

This is a movie that feels more like a suggestion of itself than it does an actual movie, not quite a joke movie invented for a Hollywood satire, but almost — a movie within a movie of which we’ve accidentally gotten the whole thing instead of just the choice snippets.. Cuz, like, the idea of this movie is better than the movie itself. (I have often thought this of some men — “I like the idea of this guy more than the dude himself” — so there’s some romantic relevance, at least.)

Peter Dinklage (The Angry Birds Movie 2, Avengers: Infinity War) — one of the finest actors working today — as soulful and eloquent Cyrano de Bergerac, minus the big nose but still lacking the confidence to admit his feelings to the woman he adores? Love it. And he can sing! He gets to do some swordfighting! But way too much is missing that is absolutely required to make this work. The big one: we need to believe that that woman he longs for is worthy of his devotion. And there’s nothing here to convince us of that.

Roxanne (Haley Bennett: Swallow, The Girl on the Train) is very pretty, but she comes across as stupid and shallow, at best. How can she sincerely believe that she has fallen in love with a handsome soldier, Christian (Kelvin Harrison Jr.: The Photograph, Luce), merely by catching glimpse of him across a crowded public space? How can she maintain her self-delusion when the awkward, clumsy words that come out of his mouth when she finally does speak with him do not match, not even remotely, the smooth, charming poetry of his letters… which were, of course, written by Cyrano, expressing his own passion for Roxanne? How does she not know her smitten correspondent is Cyrano himself, when he takes over from Christian to woo her, from a hiding place, at her balcony one night? She’s known Cyrano since she was a child! She knows his voice!

Cyrano Kelvin Harrison Jr
When he’s cute but kinda dumb…

Hints of ambiguity are dropped occasionally that she does, in fact, realize what’s going on, until all doubts are quashed forever. She really hasn’t a clue, and there’s only one explanation for that: She’s an idiot.

This is not romantic, unless in the most depressing, most tragic interpretation of the word. There’s no humor, no absurdity in this take on one of literature’s great thwarted lovers, just misery and pain. (I now long to rewatch the 1987 romantic comedy Roxanne, starring Steve Martin and Daryl Hannah, which I recall as being utterly delightful.) I don’t think we’re intended to take this as so dark: there are touches of fairy-tale fantasy; certainly Ben Mendelsohn (Captain Marvel, Robin Hood) as the absolutely vile nobleman after Roxanne is close to pantomime camp. And there is glorious color and light in the Sicilian locations (the action has been moved from France); the beautiful cinematography is by Seamus McGarvey, who also shot the magical The Greatest Showman and 2012’s audaciously stylized Anna Karenina.

Cyrano Peter Dinklage
I wish this movie was as lush emotionally as it is visually.

That Anna Karenina was from director Joe Wright, as Cyrano is, and I’m afraid this is but another baffling misstep from the filmmaker. He started out making daring, enrapturing films such as Atonement and a sexy and visceral Pride & Prejudice, but lately has fumbled through Darkest Hour, which is nothing but Gary Oldman stomping around in a Winston Churchill suit, and the disastrous Pan, an embarrassingly empty pastiche of beloved action blockbusters.

I’m tempted to wonder if perhaps it all works better onstage; this is based on the off-Broadway play by Erica Schmidt. (She is married to Peter Dinklage, and they both say the role was not written with him in mind.) But the music, also ported over from the play and written by the band The National, is downbeat at best, and often harsh and jarring. The unpleasantness of Cyrano is as puzzling as it is inescapable.


more films like this:
• Roxanne [Prime US | Prime UK | Apple TV | Hulu US | Paramount+ US]
• The Greatest Showman [Prime US | Prime UK | Apple TV | Disney+ US]

share and enjoy
               
If you’re tempted to post a comment that resembles anything on the film review comment bingo card, please reconsider.
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
If you’re logged in here to comment via Facebook and you’re having problems, please see this post.
PLEASE NOTE: The many many Disqus comments that were missing have mostly been restored! I continue to work with Disqus to resolve the lingering issues and will update you asap.
subscribe
notify of
2 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
amanohyo
amanohyo
moviegoer
Thu, Feb 24, 2022 1:48pm

What a shame. I’ve never seen Schmidt’s play, but it seems as if this film adaptation would have benefitted from some self-aware humor, although I suppose a silly tone would undermine the message that little people are just as capable of serious, dramatic romance as anyone else. Dinklage is certainly a skilled enough actor to pull off a mix of ridiculous humor and touching drama though.

For example, imagine the erotic kneading montage launching off into a poetic dance parody of the sexiest Disney musical sequence of all time, or Roxanne delivering a stream of cleverly themed little person jokes to a man who lazily insults Cyrano. I’m a huge fan of some of The National’s downbeat songs, and I could see how they’d be perfect for some sad, pensive moments, but it’s definitely a weird choice to use their music for an entire romantic musical. Maybe it all works better on stage.

Magess
Magess
Fri, Mar 11, 2022 6:00pm

I actually thought the love letter scenes were a lot more cringey than the dough and baking. Yeah girl, get that ink and paper! 🤨

But I also thought that maybe this is what the play was? And so this is just what you get when you do an adaptation of a musical that is very aware of being a play and not a movie.