To the Stars movie review: run into the ground

part of my Directed by Women series
Get new reviews in your email in-box or in an app by becoming a paid Substack subscriber or Patreon patron.

To the Stars red light

MaryAnn’s quick take…

Coming-of-age melodrama about misfit girls is at first passingly diverting, but it whips up mystery and suspense where it shouldn’t be, diminishing and minimizing an already neglected kind of story.
I’m “biast” (pro): I’m desperate for movies by and about girls and women
I’m “biast” (con): nothing
(what is this about? see my critic’s minifesto)
women’s participation in this film
female director, female screenwriter, female protagonist
(learn more about this)

When is a spoiler not a spoiler? When, as is the case with historical melodrama To the Stars, the thing that is whipped up into a matter of mystery and suspense is nothing that should ever be treated this way. You may not even realize it has been a matter of mystery and suspense until the film offers up its big reveal in a benighted twist, at which point you’re just cringing on the movie’s behalf, that it thought this was a good idea.

Stars is extra awful in this regard because how it organizes its plot ensures that there is no meaningful exploration of one of its central characters; instead, it unforgivably reduces her to a cog in someone else’s tale. What could have been a powerful instance of much-needed representation instead becomes a diminishment and a minimizing of an already neglected kind of story. The very audience that might be drawn to seeing itself onscreen may well be horrified at what it encounters herein.

I’ll tell you when I’m about to spoil Stars’s secret, so you can turn away if you like. Though you may even guess it before I get there, as I did watching the movie.

To the Stars Kara Hayward
Will Iris remove her glasses and suddenly become “pretty”? You bet!

First-time screenwriter Shannon Bradley-Colleary piles on the misery for teen Iris Deerborne (Kara Hayward: Us, Isle of Dogs), who is just trying to keep her head down and make it through high school in 1961 rural Oklahoma. But being a nerdy, science-fiction-reading misfit among the catty-cheerleader crowd isn’t enough: she also has to contend with a weak bladder leading to embarrassing bathroom accidents that have landed her with a horrible nickname the whole school seems to know. Plus Iris’s mom (Jordana Spiro: The Goods: Live Hard, Sell Hard, Must Love Dogs) is a drunk who is openly ashamed by her oddball daughter.

But then an exciting new girl arrives from sophisticated Kansas City. Maggie Richmond (Liana Liberato: If I Stay, Trust) is pretty obviously lying about herself and the work her dad (Tony Hale: The Angry Birds Movie 2, Toy Story 4) does to big herself up, or perhaps to cover up — if only in her own mind — the uncomfortable reason her family has moved to town. We don’t know for a while what that might be, but we get a few hints that it’s nothing a respectable white-bread midcentury American family would want to admit to. Anyway, Maggie clearly feels an empathy with outcast Iris, and the two girls become fast friends.

To the Stars
The festival version of To the Stars was in black-and-white. Which is ironically fitting.

For about about 80 minutes, To the Stars is a passingly diverting coming-of-age drama: a bit overcooked, but with nice performances from Hayward and Liberato and elegant direction by Martha Stephens that takes good advantage of wide-open prairie spaces to amplify Iris’s loneliness. (Apparently this movie was presented at some festivals in black-and-white, which might have been even more visually interesting. It’s in color for its VOD release.) And it’s about eccentric teen girls pushing back against stifling conformity, which we don’t get enough of in the movies. True, the title makes little sense. I thought maybe geeky Iris was going to turn out to be harboring hopes of applying to join the Mercury 13 lady astronauts or something, but no such luck. We actually learn nothing at all about either girl’s dreams for her life beyond making it past prom. Still…

And then it all goes to shit. After here is where I explain why.

Maggie, it transpires, is a lesbian, and her family had to move to escape nasty gossip and start over someplace where no one knows this. Maggie’s sexuality is not in itself a bad thing, of course, but by keeping it a secret and treating it like something shocking to be revealed as a plot complication, To the Stars is buying into the smallmindedness that it is supposedly pushing back against. I suspect Bradley-Colleary and Stephens may think they are holding up anti-gay outrage as ridiculous with the way Maggie’s secret is learned by the town, but its over-the-top quality doesn’t sit well next to the more grounded sentiment of the rest of the movie.

To the Stars Malin Akerman
Sadly, Malin Akerman as Maggie’s mother is mostly defined — pun intended — by her bullet bras.

Much worse, by refusing to deal with Maggie on her own terms, her troubles are pushed off to a remove that does not let us fully engage with her struggle, and treats her life as pure tragedy. Worst of all is how it renders Maggie as a manic pixie queer girl whose sole purpose in the movie is to aid Iris on her own journey toward confident young-womanhood and the claiming of her own (hetero) sexuality.

To the Stars has appeared at several LGBT-themed festivals, and the PR materials I received include a statement from director Stephens that openly references Maggie’s sexuality. Yet the marketing for the film now hides this aspect of it. The mixed-messaging isn’t subtle, but it is pretty offensive. As desperate as I am for movies about girls like weirdo girls such as Iris, whose unconventionality isn’t about her sexuality — being gay isn’t the only way a girl or woman can be nonconformist — there are even fewer movies about teen lesbians. But tragic lesbianism as a path by which a straight girl can find herself? Oh no. None of us need movies like this one.

To the Stars is the Alliance of Women Film Journalists’ Movie of the Week for April 24th. I could not endorse it, but for a counterpoint to my review, read the comments from other AWFJ members on why the film deserves this honor.

share and enjoy
If you’re tempted to post a comment that resembles anything on the film review comment bingo card, please reconsider.
If you haven’t commented here before, your first comment will be held for MaryAnn’s approval. This is an anti-spam, anti-troll, anti-abuse measure. If your comment is not spam, trollish, or abusive, it will be approved, and all your future comments will post immediately. (Further comments may still be deleted if spammy, trollish, or abusive, and continued such behavior will get your account deleted and banned.)
notify of
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
view all comments
Maggie Glynn
Maggie Glynn
Sun, Jan 17, 2021 6:34pm

I have to agree with the award it won. I thought it was beautifully shot and acted with a unique melding of stories that were very truthful. There were so many times where I thought they were going to take the stereotypical route but they never did once. I think some of the key points of the movie may have slipped by you while . It wasn’t some generic movie where “tragic lesbianism was a path by which a straight girl can find herself”. Might just not be touching issues that you can relate with.

Also, in your review you judged the movie for not being what you thought/hoped it would be from glancing at the title. Thats like being annoyed that the Wolf of Wall Street for not being about wolf running around wall street.

MaryAnn Johanson
reply to  Maggie Glynn
Tue, Jan 26, 2021 12:49am

It wasn’t some generic movie where “tragic lesbianism was a path by which a straight girl can find herself”

Can you explain how it was not this?